Open Access Research

Immunoadsorption therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis with steroid-refractory optical neuritis

Michael J Koziolek1*, Desiree Tampe1, Matthias Bähr2, Hassan Dihazi1, Klaus Jung3, Dirk Fitzner2, Reinhard Klingel4, Gerhard A Müller1 and Bernd Kitze2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany

2 Department of Neurology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany

3 Department of Medical Statistics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany

4 Apheresis Research Institute, Stadtwaldguertel 77, 50935, Cologne, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Neuroinflammation 2012, 9:80 doi:10.1186/1742-2094-9-80

Published: 26 April 2012

Abstract

Background

In multiple sclerosis relapses refractory to intravenous corticosteroid therapy, plasma exchange is recommended. Immunoadsorption (IA) is regarded as an alternative therapy, but its efficacy and putative mechanism of action still needs to be established.

Methods

We prospectively treated 11 patients with multiple sclerosis who had optical neuritis and fulfilled the indications for apheresis therapy (Trial registration DE/CA25/00007080-00). In total, five IA treatments were performed using tryptophan-IA. Clinical activity (visual acuity, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Incapacity Status Scale), laboratory values and visual evoked potentials were measured before, during and after IA, with a follow-up of six months. Moreover, proteomic analyses were performed to analyze column-bound proteins as well as corresponding changes in patients’ sera.

Results

After the third IA, we detected an improvement of vision in eight of eleven patients, whom we termed responders. Amongst these, the mean visual acuity improved from 0.15 ± 0.12 at baseline to 0.47 ± 0.32 after the third IA (P = 0.0252) up to 0.89 ± 0.15 (P < 0.0001) at day 180 ± 10 after IA. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor decreased in responders (P = 0.03), whereas in non-responders it did not. Proteomic analyses of proteins adsorbed to IA columns revealed that several significant immunological proteins as well as central nervous system protein fragments, including myelin basic protein, had been removed by IA.

Conclusions

IA was effective in the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory optic neuritis. IA influenced the humoral immune response. Strikingly, however, we found strong evidence that demyelination products and immunological mediators were also cleared from plasma by IA.

Keywords:
Apheresis; Autoimmune diseases; Evoked potentials/visual; Immunoadsorption; Multiple sclerosis; Optic neuritis; Proteomics